We have been receiving many visitors this past week, mainly potential) British School parents, eager for their child to be enrolled. When I meet such families a typical conversation with the child has gone something like this:
“Where do you go to school at present?”
“School X, a leading private school in Delhi.”
“Do you like it? Are you doing well?”
The answer is usually, yes to both, and the parent chips in that the child is invariably a “topper” in her/his cohort.
“So, why might you be interested in coming here, to The British School?”
The child pauses. The parent chimes in.
“Exposure…… we’ve heard it’s a great school.”
The values you hold, as parents, about your child(ren) as well as about education, make such a difference to the child and to us. It is important that we, as formal educators, and you, as informal educators, are aligned in our values.
I have been working with a group of about fifteen Years 7-10 students on a Monday afternoon, on a philosophy course. The background reading was “Sophie’s World”, which I see as a young person’s introduction to classical philosophy. It’s also a good read for adults, by the way, who are interested in the same subject. Just lately, we have been considering moral philosophy, the utilitarian ideas of Jeremy Bentham or Immanuel Kant. We’ve drawn on the teaching and writing of Harvard professor, Michael Sandel, author of “Justice : The Right Thing to Do”. I’ve used some of the same extracts with Year 12 students, in the IB Theory of Knowledge programme. One student, upon seeing Michael Sandal lecture to a couple of thousand Harvard undergraduates on the political philosophy course, asked what was the point of doing such a degree (as opposed to Business Studies or Economics, or even an MBA, I suppose). Sandel would have replied by talking about utilitarianism (the MBA – its utility is undoubted but is it academically worthwhile?) versus the intrinsic value of a political philosophy course, perhaps. The younger students were set a 1000 word homework piece, asking them to write about how to distinguish right from wrong. They talked about the role of religion, of taught values, of parenting, of cultural relativism and of consequential moral reasoning – i.e. that you may decide on whether something is the right thing to do by reference to its consequences. We discussed the captain of the cruise line, The Costa Concordia, and why he saw fit to abandon ship whilst many on board were struggling to save themselves. Almost all the students thought the captain wrong to abandon ship. We analysed why he did so, why he was expected to do otherwise and whether he was right or wrong to do what he did (and how may we, if at all, judge?).
So, what is the role of the school in moral education? We want every student to know what appropriate and inappropriate behaviour in and beyond school is. We can and do lay down rules, in time-honoured fashion, and we educate young people to make up their own minds about what is wrong and what is right in different situations. Most importantly, for the young person, two of the biggest moral influences, you as parents, us as formal educators, need to have similarly-aligned values. To accompany the values, we need a rationale for adopting them and an expected set of behavioural outcomes that may be attributed to implementing them. Our mission matters dearly to us, but so do our values: tolerance and understanding; justice and fair play; individualism as well as teamwork; maximising achievement and potential; community service , especially to those less privileged than us; students’ leadership and also internationalism. What values are most important to you as you bring up your son/daughter, or how do they align?
Graham Ranger, 3rd February 2012